They were three men whose theories of philosophy, psychology, and politics had a tremendous impact on our world and our Church – so you might think that all three would have lived enviable lives. Yet Friedrich Nietzsche, who famously asserted, “God is dead,” ended his life in an insane asylum. Sigmund Freud was revered for inventing psychoanalysis, yet he believed it merely returned man to a “tolerable level of human misery.” And while Karl Marx didn’t much like socialism, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin built on his theories to justify their atrocities.
It sounds grim, and it is. To understand the influence these schools of thought still wield and what can be done about them, EWTN is proud to announce the television premiere of a three-part series entitled “Wolves in the Fold.” (Each 30-minute episode airs at 5:30 p.m. ET, Monday through Wednesday, Dec. 2-4, on EWTN, with an encore at 2:30 a.m. ET the following day. These episodes are also available to view free On Demand at https://bit.ly/3APXQhY, and are for sale at https://bit.ly/4fRLTHw.)

Episode #3 of “Wolves in the Fold” also discusses the transition from Marxism to Cultural Marxism, which means that the desired Marxist revolution doesn’t need to be bloody; it can come about by transforming cultural institutions and the manipulation of language as seen in the pronoun debate.
While these “wolves,” these enemies of Christ, go about their destructive mission in different ways, their philosophies have several things in common. First, Nietzsche, Freud, and Marx were all atheists who rejected the idea of a transcendent God and an afterlife. As a result, they all saw life as miserable and meaningless. Second, these men valued individuals only insofar as they were useful for satisfying one’s base desires or as a productive part of a class. In their minds, happiness or meaning could only be achieved through amassing power or through the freedom to live however one wants, with violence and sexual power/freedom being the only ways of fleetingly alleviating man’s misery.
Makes you want to jump right on board, doesn’t it? And yet, many of us unwittingly do.
Here, we preview these information-packed programs, which reveal much about the three men and their destructive philosophies.

Friedrich Nietzsche died in an insane asylum at the age of 55, but his influence didn’t. We learn that his philosophy was appropriated by the Nazis, who used it to justify their preoccupation with power and the idea of a master race.
The first episode to air is “Friedrich Nietzsche: Apostle of Nihilism.” Nietzsche lived in the age of the so-called Enlightenment, which had marginalized or even gotten rid of the concept of God. Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, founder of the Ruth Institute, says the philosopher carried the idea of God’s death to its logical conclusion. “Nietzsche basically said, “If God is dead, everything is permitted.”
Dr. Carl Trueman, Professor of Biblical and Religious Studies at Grove City College in Grove City, Pa. builds on that assertion. “[W]hat the madman [Nietzsche] does is point this out to the atheists, essentially saying to them, ‘You cannot get rid of God and yet allow your moral and ethical systems to remain in place. Once you get rid of God, you yourself have to rise up and be gods. You yourself have to provide life with meaning.’”
What was the end result of Nietzsche’s efforts to become his own “agent of self-creation?” He ended up going mad.
Says the narrator: “In January 1889, Nietzsche had a mental breakdown while he was in Turin, Italy. After this episode, Nietzsche was unable to speak or write and was institutionalized for the rest of his life.”
Nietzsche died in 1900 at the age of 55,” but his influence didn’t. We learn that his philosophy was appropriated by the Nazis, who used it to justify their preoccupation with power and the idea of a master race.

In addition to her work at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Author Noelle Mering’s books include “Awake, Not Woke: A Christian Response to the Cult of Progressive Ideology.”
“What happens when you relinquish any understanding of objective moral goods and evils…how can we come to agreement on how we should run society? And so what is left but the will to power?” says Noelle Mering, a Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center where she co-directs EPPC’s Theology of Home Project. “There’s an appeal, I think, of Nietzsche to people who want to sort of disabuse themselves from any sort of call to be subject to a moral code, but who still want to feel that their lives are going to be heroic and meaningful.”
In this episode, you’ll see the influence this philosophy has had on education, on mainline Protestantism, and even on the Catholic Church, where some today want the Church to bend to the will of the people and alter her teachings.
Says Mering: “That’s not how the Catholic Church operates, nor should anyone who understands the identity of the Catholic Church want her to operate. We don’t want her to follow our will. We want to follow the will of God.”
Cardinal Ratzinger, who would become Pope Benedict XVI, lamented that modern life was ruled by a dictatorship of relativism. “In that phrase, a dictatorship of relativism, we become at the mercy of whoever is the strongman,” Mering says. “It gets back to the will to power.”

Sigmund Freud himself believed that his much vaunted psychoanalysis merely brings about greater awareness of the human condition and “returns the patient to the normal level of human misery.”
The second episode of “Wolves in the Fold” looks at “Sigmund Freud, Architect of Doubt.” We learn that the so-called Sexual Revolution of the 60s, which changed the lives of so many, has its seeds in Freud’s teachings. Freud believed that the reason we have civilization or culture is so men can’t do what they really want to do which is to have sex and commit acts of violence. But that makes us unhappy so we have to engage in psychoanalysis, which brings about greater awareness and “returns the patient to the normal level of human misery.”
Wilhelm Reich took Freud’s grim views of life one step further, arguing that sexual repression causes people to be neurotic and blames families for this repression. Up until 1930, Protestant churches agreed that contraception was an offense against God, but thanks to the emerging culture of sexual freedom it quickly became okay. As Catholics know, Pope Paul VI disagreed. He penned the prophetic document Humanae Vitae. Nevertheless, the genie was out of the bottle and New Age spirituality, the Human Potential Movement, and a greater openness towards LGBTQ issues were the result.

Pope St. John Paul II countered the sexual revolution with his Theology of the Body, which teaches that sex involves something more profound than just the physical experience, but involves the human soul and destiny, says Dr. D.C. Schindler of the John Paul II Institute.
Pope John Paul II fought back with his Theology of the Body. Dr. D.C. Schindler, Professor of Metaphysics and Anthropology at the John Paul II Institute at The Catholic University of America explains the Pope’s revolutionary counter-narrative: “The sexual act … involves something more profound than just the physical experience, but involves the human soul and involves the destiny of the person, and understanding sexuality in light of all those dimensions…far from trivializing the act fills it with an inconceivable…depth of meaning that shows the role that it has in human life…from the beginning of history.”
In Episode Three, entitled “Karl Marx, Prophet of Discontent,” things get even more complicated. Marx contended that “God” is simply people projecting onto a deity their ideal human being. Religion, he said, “distanced individuals from their genuine selves.” Marx lived during the Industrial Revolution, when many people stopped working for themselves and began working for someone else, which he believed made them cogs in a machine. He believed that by helping people understand this, they would rise up and revolt.
Disciples of Marx took this one step further. Instead of a bottoms-up revolution, Lenin believed it was an elite cadre of intellectual activists who needed to violently impose revolution. Ronald Rychlak, Professor of Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law, explains this philosophy: “Individuals are important as long as they are productive workers for the states…[O]nce they are no longer capable of doing that, they can and should be eliminated.”
Communist dictators Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and China’s Mao Zedong said the greatest obstacles to revolution are family, private property, and religion because the latter “demands ultimate loyalty to something higher than and separate from the state.” Therefore, Christians, especially priests and religious, must be eliminated.

Instead of the bottoms-up revolution advocated by Karl Marx, his disciples Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong believed it was an elite cadre of intellectual activists who needed to violently impose revolution.
Despite the horrors above, we learn that certain groups in the West tried to harmonize Marx’s theories with theology. Some Protestants went with the “social gospel” of Walter Rauschenbush, while some Catholics turned to “Liberation Theology.” These attempts turn social work into a religion with no need for Christ.
“The Marxist influence on things like liberation theology failed to honor the Church’s understanding of justice and the nobility of the human being,” says Fr. Ambrose Little, O.P. Assistant Director of The Dominican House of Studies’ Thomistic Institute in Washington, DC., “There is a tendency … to understand the person only contextually…as a class and not as individuals.”
This episode goes on to discuss the transition from Marxism to Cultural Marxism, which meant that the desired revolution didn’t need to be bloody; it could come about by transforming cultural institutions and the manipulation of language as seen in the pronoun debate. “[R]ather than trying to create just a class war, they wanted to create a war between men and women [and] among the races…and antagonize them for the sake of a revolutionary end,” Mering says.
All of this and more has profoundly impacted Western civilization and the Catholic Church, which this episode explains in detail.
However, in the end, Mering says: “Marxist ideology can only break things down, and the Catholic Church, at its very core, is a life-giving institution. It’s in our families. It’s in the call to be fruitful and multiply. … in the way in which it presents a positive life that is in harmony with our humanity, not in contradiction of it.”
This is only a small taste of what is in these important episodes, which you will want to watch more than once so you can combat the evil of these philosophies when you confront them.
Like this:
Like Loading...